DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Xiaomi MIMO V2.5 Pro: Speed and Visual Quality
MIMO V2.5 Pro beats DeepSeek V4 Pro with faster output and cleaner visuals, thanks to its multimodal roots. DeepSeek V4 Vision may close the gap.
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Xiaomi MIMO V2.5 Pro
MIMO V2.5 Pro wins on two factors:
1. about 1 minute faster than DeepSeek V4 Pro
2. cleaner visual style
Reason: MIMO V2.5 Pro has been a multimodal model from the start, so it better understands what high-quality visuals should look like.
It will be interesting to see how DeepSeek V4 Vision changes this.
Comments
Weekly digest
The best of vibe coding, AI agents and open source — once a week, no spam.
Related articles
All articlesDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 244 tps, $500/mo, Free API Search Till Oct 31
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 delivers 244 tokens per second, beating GPT‑6.1 Sol, priced at $500/month. Its web‑search API is free until Oct 31, then $0.75 per 1k requests.
CodexSaver: Cut AI Costs by Offloading Low-Risk Tasks to DeepSeek
CodexSaver routes low-risk tasks from Codex to DeepSeek, keeping costly models for decisions—48% average savings across five tasks with ~6s latency.
Google Releases EmbeddingGemma 2: Open Multimodal On‑Device Model
EmbeddingGemma 2 is a 740M‑parameter open multimodal embedding model from Google, running on‑device for text, code, images, video and audio, enabling private local RAG with Gemma 4.